Every ringgit in the model, traced to a facility.
The standalone financial model produces one line — RM 1.58m Year 1 rising to RM 6.67m at Year 7 peak. This page decomposes that aggregate into the ten underlying revenue streams, exposes the physical maximum of each (the ceiling imposed by ticket price × operating hours × days per year × facility capacity — not an achievable target), and lets you drag the utilisation slider to test the model at your own assumptions.
The Mar-2026 price list is the input, not a guess.
Every projection below traces to the ticketing price list dated 04-March-2026. Prices exclude 6% SST. Peak = Fri/Sat/Sun/PH/school holidays (≈ 120 days/year). Off-peak = Mon–Thu.
Pricing & operating windows 04-Mar-2026 · locked
Ten revenue streams. Each with capacity math.
Move the utilisation slider on any card to test that facility's revenue at different assumptions. The model's projected utilisation is highlighted. The headroom line shows how much revenue capacity remains untouched at Y7 peak.
Aggregate check — the ten streams sum exactly to the standalone total.
If the facility buildup is real, the sum of the individual streams should reproduce the standalone model's total PT_REV line. It does — to zero error.
Verdict on the projection posture
None of the ten lines is projected at its physical maximum. At Y7 peak, revenue streams sit at 15% to 88% of the ceiling imposed by ticket price × hours × days × capacity. The 53%-of-revenue Wet & Dry Park runs at 21% of session-fill max. Indoor Softplay at 15%. Mini Football at 52% (across 2 pitches from Y3+). Pickleball at 43%. Only the two sub-let lines (Retail 85%, Gerais 88%) approach their envelope — because those are occupancy-based, not throughput-based, and the ceiling itself is finite (7 units × RM 4.5k, 8 gerais × RM 800–1,200 + GTO). The model isn't projecting sold-out days at any zone. It's projecting a park running at 30–50% of what mature throughput could deliver — a fair projection with growth headroom preserved for multi-site expansion.